
Casper vs Emma Mattress Canada: Complete Comparison Guide 2025
|
|
Time to read 7 min
|
|
Time to read 7 min
Canadians are increasingly choosing between two popular online mattresses: Casper and Emma. Both promise better sleep through innovative materials and convenient online shopping, but which delivers better value for Canadian sleepers?
Understanding the construction differences, comfort layer features, and real-world performance helps you make the right choice for your sleep needs. At Fawcett Mattress, we believe that informed decisions lead to better sleep, which is why we're sharing this comprehensive comparison of mainstream options while highlighting what makes our approach to sleep unique.
Feature |
Casper Original |
Emma Original |
---|---|---|
Price (Queen) |
$1,299 CAD |
$979 CAD |
Construction |
3-layer all-foam |
3-layer all-foam |
Firmness |
Medium-firm (6/10) |
Medium (5/10) |
Trial Period |
100 nights |
365 nights |
Warranty |
10 years |
10 years |
Made In |
USA |
Mexico |
Cover |
Non-removable recycled materials |
Removable, machine-washable |
Edge Support |
Good |
Average |
Motion Isolation |
Very good |
Excellent |
Both brands target the convenience-focused Canadian market, but they take different approaches to materials and customer experience.
The fundamental difference lies in their design philosophy. The Casper mattress focuses on engineered zoning and American manufacturing, while the Emma mattress emphasizes adaptability and extended trial periods. These differences impact everything from how the mattress feels to long-term durability.
The Casper clearly discloses US production facilities and uses CertiPUR-US certified foams throughout their lineup. Emma's Canadian operations present some inconsistencies while marketing materials reference German engineering, law tags indicate Mexican manufacturing, creating potential confusion for transparency-conscious buyers.
The Casper implements targeted support in their transition layer, with 30% increased density beneath the lumbar region to support spinal alignment. Emma uses uniform foam density across the sleeping surface, creating more consistent pressure relief but less targeted support for specific body zones.
The Emma mattress features all-foam mattress construction that centers on their proprietary Airgocell® foam technology. This open-cell polyfoam creates the top comfort layer, designed to enhance airflow while providing immediate pressure relief. Below this sits 2 inches of viscoelastic memory foam that adapts to body contours, followed by a 6-inch high-density base layer.
The removable cover represents Emma's most practical advantage. Made from 99% polyester and 1% elastane, it's machine-washable and features moisture-wicking properties. This convenience factor appeals to families with children or anyone prioritizing mattress hygiene.
The Casper original mattress engineering emphasizes zoned support through their AirScape™ perforated foam comfort layer. This 1.5-inch top layer features targeted perforations for enhanced cooling, while the underlying 2-inch memory foam layer provides pressure relief with ergonomic firmness variations.
The key innovation lies in Casper's transition layer, which varies density across different body zones. Firmer sections provide more support to the midsection while softer areas cradle shoulders and hips. This targeted approach benefits back sleepers and stomach sleepers who need consistent spinal alignment.
For those seeking our natural approach to sleep, explore our Sombrio Natural Latex Mattress, which offers superior breathability and durability compared to synthetic foam alternatives.
Emma mattresses tend toward the softer end of the medium range, rating approximately 5 out of 10 on the firmness scale. The combination of Airgocell® foam and memory foam creates deep body contouring that appeals to side sleepers under 230 pounds. The softer profile allows pressure points at the shoulders and hips to sink in while the memory foam provides gradual support.
Casper delivers a slightly firmer feel, typically rating 6-6.5 on the firmness scale. The zoned memory foam layer creates varying sensations across the mattress surface, firmer support under the torso and softer cushioning around the shoulders. This targeted approach helps maintain spinal neutrality for back and stomach sleepers.
The Emma mattress is best suited for side sleepers weighing under 230 pounds, those who prefer gentle pressure relief, couples with similar comfort preferences, and sleepers who want a softer, more conforming feel.
The Casper suits back and stomach sleepers, combination sleepers who change positions, heavier individuals weighing over 230 pounds, and those seeking targeted lumbar support tailored to their sleeping positions.
At Fawcett, we understand that firmness preferences vary significantly between partners. Our Qualicum Flippable Hybrid Mattress allows different firmness levels on each side, eliminating the need to compromise on comfort.
Both brands address temperature regulation differently. Emma's Airgocell® foam utilizes an open-cell structure designed to encourage airflow, while its removable cover includes moisture-wicking properties. However, the 2-inch memory foam layer can retain some heat, particularly for hot sleepers.
Casper's approach involves perforated AirScape™ foam in the comfort layer, creating channels for heat dissipation. Their hybrid models offer better cooling through coil systems that promote airflow and prevent overheating. Premium models include phase-change materials that actively regulate temperature for those who sleep hot.
For Canadians prioritizing natural temperature regulation, our organic wool bedding collection naturally wicks moisture and regulates temperature without synthetic additives.
Laboratory testing shows the Emma mattress excels in motion isolation, absorbing 92% of disturbance energy in all-foam models compared to 89% absorption rate. This advantage stems from Emma's thicker memory foam layer that dampens movement transfer between partners.
Edge support presents a different story. The Casper demonstrates superior perimeter reinforcement with only 18% compression under 150-pound pressure, while Emma's edges compress 25% under identical conditions. This difference matters for couples who use the full bed surface or individuals who sit on the mattress edge.
The Emma mattress positions itself as the value option with queen-size mattresses starting at $979 CAD compared to $1,299 CAD entry point. This 25% price difference makes Emma attractive for budget-conscious buyers.
However, value extends beyond initial cost. Higher-density base foams suggest potential longevity advantages. Durability projections indicate that both brands should perform optimally for 7-8 years, although denser construction may extend the functional lifespan by 12-18 months.
Emma's 365-night trial period significantly exceeds the 100-night offering, allowing more time to evaluate comfort and performance. This extended trial partially offsets the lower price point by reducing purchase risk.
Emma benefits include an extended 365-night trial period, a removable and washable cover, a lower entry price point, excellent motion isolation, and a softer feel that appeals to side sleepers. Drawbacks include inconsistent manufacturing transparency, below-average edge support, potential softness issues for heavier sleepers, and limited firmness options.
Benefits include clear US manufacturing, superior edge support, zoned support for spinal alignment, a commitment to recycled materials, and improved suitability for combination sleepers. Drawbacks include a higher price point, a shorter trial period, a non-removable cover, and potential firmness issues for dedicated side sleepers.
Before selecting between these two mattresses, consider your specific sleep needs and long-term goals. While both brands offer convenience and reasonable comfort, they rely on synthetic foam layers that may off-gas initially and break down over time.
Sleep position preferences matter significantly. Side sleepers often prefer Emma's softer profile, while back and stomach sleepers benefit from firmer support. Body weight considerations also apply, as heavier individuals typically need firmer support.
Temperature sensitivity becomes important since both brands use synthetic materials that can retain heat, unlike natural alternatives. Environmental concerns also factor in, as neither approach the sustainability of responsibly sourced natural materials.
For Canadians seeking truly sustainable sleep solutions, our hybrid mattress collection combines the support of individually wrapped coils with the breathability and durability of natural latex, organic cotton, and organic wool.
Also read:
Is Emma better than Casper?
Neither mattress is universally "better" since it depends on your sleep needs. The Emma mattress excels for side sleepers under 230 pounds who prefer softer pressure relief and want an extended trial period. The Casper mattress is well-suited for back sleepers, stomach sleepers, and heavier individuals who require firmer, zoned support. Consider your sleep position, body weight, and comfort preferences when choosing.
What mattress is better than Casper?
For Canadians seeking superior materials and craftsmanship, natural latex mattresses offer advantages in durability, breathability, and environmental sustainability. Unlike synthetic foam mattress options that may off-gas and compress over time, natural latex provides consistent support for decades, remaining naturally antimicrobial and dust mite-resistant.
How easy is it to set up and unbox Emma and Casper mattresses?
Both brands ship compressed in boxes and expand within 24-48 hours. Emma includes clear setup instructions, and their removable cover simplifies initial preparation. The non-removable cover means immediate use once expanded. Both require minimal effort to set up, though Emma's washable cover provides ongoing maintenance advantages.
Which mattress is more suitable for individuals who weigh more?
The Casper generally suits heavier sleepers better due to its slightly firmer feel (6-6.5/10 versus Emma's 5/10) and higher-density base layer. The zoned support system prevents excessive sinking in the midsection while maintaining comfort at the shoulders and hips. Emma's softer profile may result in uncomfortable compression for individuals weighing over 230 pounds.
Both Casper and Emma offer convenient online mattress shopping with reasonable comfort for many sleepers, but they represent different approaches to sleep technology. The Emma mattress prioritizes adaptability and value through extended trials and washable covers, while the Casper mattress focuses on engineered support and American manufacturing.
However, both brands rely on synthetic foam that may not provide the longevity and natural benefits that serious sleep investors seek. For Canadians who value craftsmanship, natural materials, and long-term performance, consider exploring our complete mattress collection, where every sleep surface is crafted on Vancouver Island using sustainable, natural materials designed to last decades, not just years.
Citations:
[1] https://www.mattress-reviews.com/mattress-reviews/emma-mattress-review/
[2] https://www.sleepadvisor.org/casper-vs-emma/
[3] https://mattressclarity.com/reviews/casper-vs-emma/
[4] https://naplab.com/mattress-reviews/emma-hybrid-cooling-elite-review/
[5] https://www.sleepfoundation.org/mattress-reviews/emma-mattress-review
The Author: Duane Franklin
Co-Founder
A mattress maker since the age of 18, Duane honed his skills under the guidance of a master craftsman and gradually earned a reputation as Victoria's premier mattress maker. Through his experience and direct engagement with customers, he arrived at a valuable understanding of the perfect materials and methods for mattress making. Soon after, he met Ross and Fawcett Mattress was born.